Ok let me be a lil more clear, i wasnt referring to public access to the repo's i was talking about access to update the underlying information is the intent to allow the public to edit the data in these repositories, my concern would be that if unprotected (or writable) the repository could become compromised and the unsuspecting download a copy of corrupt data.
On Mar 17, 2008, at 7:55 PM, Robert Loomans wrote: > Tony Li wrote: >> One benefit would be a secure, automatic exchanges without cleartext >> authentication. > > There is no authentication for the repositories. They are publicly, > anonymously available. > > Every party who wants to check one of your assertions (ROA, etc) > needs to be able to retrieve the appropriate certificates, CRLs, etc. > > Rob > > -- > Robert Loomans Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Senior Software Engineer, APNIC Phone: +61 7 3858 > 3100 > http://www.apnic.net Fax: +61 7 3858 > 3199 _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
