Robert Loomans wrote:
Jeffrey Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:49:49AM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
My question is: is it of any value to define a "canonical" format for
a ROA?
I believe that we should have a canonical form for the resources in a
ROA, and that we mandate that form in the ROA.
If you cannot define a canonical form, how do you define equivalence?
(Yes, you can define equivalence algorithmically, but that algorithm is
essentially a method for deriving a canonical form...)
Are we saying we don't need a definition of equivalence?
Can you give an example of where this would be useful?
Robert
_______________________________________________
Sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
