How active is the work on documenting RSYNC in a referencable, stable way? If I don't see an I-D, I tend to have low expectations of clearing up the reference in cases like these. I have sent mails to Andrew Tridgell in the past and gotten no response. I also corresponded with Dan Shearer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) who may be able to get us answers if we have specific questions about the IPR.

Lisa


On Aug 13, 2008, at 8:50 AM, David Ward wrote:

Note that there are folks working to make the use of rsync a non- issue by clearing up the IPR and get reference implementations and docs together. Clearly rsync has been in use for millenia (in internet time scales).

-DWard

On Aug 13, 2008, at 2:54 AM, Terry Manderson wrote:


On 12/08/2008, at 11:58 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:


A social aspect that I'm cognisant of is that there appeared to be reluctance by some parties to accept the rescerts draft because it had a non-ietf reference implementation which potentially could raise issues about interoperability between releases. This draft should nullify those as it does provide an IETF standard for retrieval - so with luck allowing the pivotal draft in question to gain adoption faster.

Sorry for the late reply, I missed this remark.

The objections I've heard raised about rsync are (1) it has NO specification beyond the code, which of course changes daily, leading to interoperability issues, should anyone else attempt to implement and (2) there's this license issue (formerly GPL v2, now GPL v3) [IANAL, YMMV]. Lack of *IETF* spec, or reference implementation of same, has not been a problem.

--Sandy


Thanks for the clarification Sandy, I'll step back from the "non- ietf" point of view. (although in some ways it still drags on me, but it isn't a defining factor) I think your two points are far more salient in the broader view of the SIDR system architecture.

Cheers
Terry

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr


_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to