Hi,

I'd defer the actual decision to those with more operational experience. My only wish is that whatever the decision is, it should be explicitly documented in the document (ie. "overlaps can happen and they are fine" or "there should be no overlaps at all").

Geoff: my definition of overlap would be (B) and (C) - ie. one or more IP addresses covered by two or more entries. (A) does not contain an overlap. I think this is consistent with what Ruediger said at the mike.

Cheers,
Robert


Matt Lepinski wrote:
Geoff,

My understanding of the discussion at the meeting was that the proposed prohibition would cover all three cases that you list below. The proposal was raised by Rob Kisteleki and Rob Austein, so I defer to either of them who would like to clarify.

Either way, it seems to be a small issue, and so I'm inclined to do whatever makes implementation of the spec easiest.

- Matt Lepinski

Geoff Huston wrote:

WG Chair hat off

On 18/11/2008, at 8:01 AM, Matt Lepinski wrote:

Two issues came up during the ROA Format presentation at IETF 73:

1) Should the ROA Format draft explicitly prohibit a ROA with overlapping prefixes? (E.g. A ROA that says AS # 1 can originate routes to 10/8, 10.10/16 and 10.20/16)


What do you mean by overlap Matt?

a) 10.0.0.0/8 maxlength=9 and 10.0.0.0/24 maxlength=24

or

b) 10.0.0.0/8 maxlength=24 and 10.0.0.0/16 maxlength=16

or

c) 10.0.0.0/8 maxlength=17 and 10.0.0.0/16 maxlength=24

seems to me that b) is the only case where the second item is completely subsumed by the first, yet all three contain "overlapping prefixes"

It also seems to me that all these cases are essentially harmless.

My opinion is NOT to put this prohibition into the document, assuming of course that there is some clarity over what is meant precisely by "overlapping prefixes" in the first place

  Geoff






_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to