Andy Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve, This explanation helps my understanding significantly. Thanks.
Regarding the rejection by complaint relying party software: this is
because the validation step includes looking for the specific OID
assigned by the CP draft? In other words, if another CP assigned
another OID and the relying party software could be configured to
additionally accommodate said OID, then this specification suite
could be used in a slightly different context?
This would, of course, presume that there was a pressing need for the
community to have two CP's for two different systems that both looked
like rPKI infrastructures, and I'll admit that I'm having trouble
imagining why that would be desirable for our community.
/John
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
