On 26/11/2008, at 4:26 PM, Randy Bush wrote: (quoting ggm, who quotes
the roa draft)
2.1.3.2. eContent
The content of a ROA identifies a single AS that has been authorized
by the address space holder to originate routes and a list of one or
more IP address prefixes that will be advertised. If the address
space holder needs to authorize multiple ASes to advertise the same
set of address prefixes, the holder issues multiple ROAs, one per AS
number.
and
4. Security Considerations
.... The purpose of a ROA is to convey authorization for an AS to
originate a route to the prefix(es) in the ROA.
these are basic, clear, simple, concise, terse, and rigorous
definition
of the semantics of a roa.
and incomplete. for example, this does not deal with netmask and max
len issues.
randy
As Yakov Rekhter might say in IDR "please send text"
ie, if you dislike these words, please instead of just knocking down,
can you help construct?
noting netmask, maxlen, which clearly removed the 'rigorous' -what
else is wrong with the text?
-George
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
