I support this document as WG item. Roque Gagliano LACNIC.
On 26/03/2009, at 12:32, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important topic (trust anchors) from the res certs profile document. As this was work that had already been a working group work item, I suggested that it should be submitted as a wg draft, rather than an individual draft.That decision meant that the wg missed an opportunity to explicitly accept this draft as a working group item.Those who objected said that they thought the missing process step was needed.So I am requesting that the working group members state whether or not they accept draft draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt as a working group draft.Please reply (yes or no, both are important) to the list by Thurs 2 April 2009.(The deadline is Thursday rather than Wednesday because (a) it is late and (b) that would make the deadline 1 April 2009, which would send the wrong message.)--Sandy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
