On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Danny McPherson<[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks, > Wondering if anyone has given thought to how exchange > point prefixes will be handled in the RPKI model? As > you likely know, many ISPs originate and announce these > prefixes from their own AS, and use not only internally, > but usually advertise to "customer peers", in order to
ideally they should only need this prefix internally (for reachability of the next-hop for learned routes). That could be short-circuited as well with resetting the next-hop to the loopback of the ISP router connected to the exchange. > not break uRPF related stuff, and allow reachability for > diagnostics and the like by downstream ASN, etc.. > > How would this be accommodated with the current model? > I think that the model allows you to have unverified routes, and (depending upon the implementation, of which there aren't any live ones) preference or filter based on this fact. So, perhaps leave a filter-hole to permit this prefix to be used... -Chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
