Many thanks to Roque for taking minutes and to Geoff for editting them
into the cleaner narrative form.
Since the raw minutes have details that haven't been posted to this
list or otherwise archived, I suggest including both the raw notes and
the editted form in the minutes submission.
In comparing the raw and editted minutes, one thing jumped out.
The editted version shows an action item of:
"Revise the CP to include text that limited the applicability of the
RPKI such that validly signed objects would need to be specified in
an IETF Standards track document."
While I saw that suggestion in the raw notes, I don't remember it
getting enough support to count as an action item. That said, I
haven't looked back at my own notes to see what I think was said --
I'm just comparing the two versions of the minutes.
-- Sam
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
