In message <p06240804c6d540a5b...@[10.71.0.216]> Stephen Kent writes: > > At 12:22 AM -0400 9/15/09, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > >In message <[email protected]> > >John Schnizlein writes: > >> > >> David, > >> > >> What you may be looking for is Steve Kent's Trust Anchor Management > >> presentation (and the errata slide 13) - the last items in the SIDR > >> materials from IETF 75. > >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/75/materials.html > >> > >> John > > > > > >Its in a vendor proprietary format. > > > >Never trust anyone that uses vendor proprietary formats. :-) > > > >Curtis > > Oh, I am soooo hurt. Would PDF be OK, despite it's proprietary > nature? If you require ASCII art you'll have a very long wait :-). > > Steve
Steve, PDF is fine. <aside> AFAIK Adobe does publish its formats, xpdf and other readers work, and open software can usually write PDF, always without a license. Adobe has always allowed for free software. If memory servers me, the open software community continued to use postscript until Adobe loosenned restrictions. It is too bad that IETF has not been as vigalent regarding slides as with drafts and RFCs. The XML rfc index is a real improvement. XML as an rfc input format doesn't seem to be used often AFAIK and it should. DocBook might be good for slides if open tools were more mature. </aside> Curtis _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
