#5: Nit report - terminology
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: g...@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: rescerts-provisioning | Version:
Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
naming of actors in this document still assumes that ISPs are the
children. children might be RIRs (parent IANA), or end sites (parent
ISPs or owning non-end user sites (e.g. business subsidiaries or govt
structures)).
again, i suggest something like 'parent' and 'child', though i am not
strongly attached to those words.
randy
----------
Yes, in the context of the definition of terms for this document.
Would a global replace of "ISP" with "subject" and "IR" with "issuer" be a
sufficient resolution of this discussion?
Byron
-----------
WG discussion appears to have resulted in the recommendation to change the
terms used in the draft from "IR" and "ISP" to "Issuer" and "Subject"
respectively.
--
Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/trac/ticket/5>
sidr <http://tools.ietf.org/sidr/>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
