At 8:44 PM -0500 11/9/09, Russ Housley wrote:
Every time I have seen the use of more than one element in the set,
people get confused, which in turn results in more complexity, at
least in the user interfaces. Why accept this complexity? I'm not
seeing an offsetting benefit.
Russ
I admit that we could do it either way, but so far we have seen no
CAs that can't do the set.
If we choose to represent the two attributes (that need not always be
present) as two RDNs, we would have to decide on the order.
I'm not wedded to the set representation; I just prefer it from a
semantic perspective.
Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
