The options for documenting this aspect of distinguished name structure for the 
RPKI are to place this in either the CP, the architecture, or the certificate 
profile documents. 

It is important to think about this from the perspective of a future reader of 
the RPKI documents.

In that context,  it seems to me that this is clearly a profile constraint, and 
thus should be with the other format constraints over names and structural 
elements in the certificate profile draft. 

Therefore,  I wish to advocate to the WG that this name constraint for both 
Issuer, and Subject names in RPKI certificates be documented in the res-cert 
profile document.

Sorry for a late addition to this document in WGLC Steve, but I think this is 
necessary.

cheers

-George
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to