I have read this draft, believe that (with one exception, below) it's consistent with my implementation, and think it should go forward.
The one exception is section 4.3 on access protocol, already noted in WG trac ticket #6. Terry's right here, the draft is wrong, and the authors have already agreed to fix it, so I have no further issue. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
