#13: Nit Report - ROA Format
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: g...@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: roa-format | Version:
Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Rob Austein reported: My only comment from this review is that the text
"If it is present it
MUST be ignored by the relying party" in sections 2.1.6.4.3 and
2.1.6.4.4 is perhaps a bit strong. The text immediately following in
both cases is fine, and I believe expresses the real intent here: that
relying parties not use these timestamp fields in determining whether
a ROA is valid. As stated, however, this could be construed as
forbidding an application that uses ROAs from using that field for any
purposes whatsoever, which seems excessive.
--
Ticket URL: <http://zinfandel.levkowetz.com/wg/sidr/trac/ticket/13>
sidr <http://tools.ietf.org/sidr/>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
