One comment to the list
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg01428.html)
mentioned the language used to describe signing objects and certificates.
The message suggested that the very precise language be used at the
beginning with a statement that the common but imprecise language used
elsewhere meant the same thing.
As wg chair, I received a strong protest to allowing the imprecise
language in the draft and assuring me that this would be raised in IETF
last call if allowed. The protester volunteered to work with the authors
to provide suggestions for precise language in each use in the draft.
--Sandy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
