Hi, Sean,
Is there only one RFC 2119 keyword in the ID on purpose (one "MUST" in section 2.3).
No, my oversight. I was under the impression that the draft needed only the changes that were brought up in the previous WG Last Call and at IETF 76 and consequently didn't do a more global review/editorial pass. So while the current wording reflects the past year's feedback (and maybe folks' desire to be diplomatic), I should have replaced a number of "will"s, "may"s, etc. with RFC 2119 keywords.
Thank you, Karen _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
