On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > max-len is at the choice of the issuer of the roa. it is a macro so > they do not have to issue all the smaller roas. if they don't want the > longer prefixes announced, then they should not issue the roas, whether > as individual roas or in the equivalent max-len macro.
note that in a transitional world there will either be: 1) a chance to put a more specific in un-validated and cause an outage while the signer runs around getting rpki updates flushed thorugh 2) lots of max-len=24 roas Once utopia arrives folks could back off to their prefix-len +1 max-len (or something not 'every to the /24'... -chris > and the pakistan telkom accident is not a useful analogy. the > announcement did not come from the owning asn. you say tomato, I say tool of the regime to get a recalcitrants attention... (I really don't know, but the point is likely only the implementor of the change does) -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
