I am in favor of adopting this document, with one (hopefully minor) exception.
I'm concerned that this document cites "rcynic" vs. "rsync" as the protocol to employ for access to the RPKI repository. There has been a moderate amount of effort to make the IESG comfortable with citing rsync in an RFC. I see no need to adopt a variant of this base protocol as a standard for RPKI access. I also note that BBN's relying party code uses rsync, not rcynic, for such access.
Steve _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
