On 2010.06.06. 21:21, Samuel Weiler wrote:
I just submitted an i-d documenting a much simpler trust anchor format
than the one in the current WG draft. Like the format in the WG doc,
this one allows for a long-lived trust anchor even though the unlying
certificate changes more often, e.g. when new resources are added. This
format has the advantage of being noticeably simpler.
I encourage the WG to adopt this format in place of the one in the
current WG doc.
-- Sam
My friend grep tells me I should support the adoption of this document.
Robert
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
