Hi, On 7/26/10 9:59 AM, Geoff Huston wrote: > > On 14/07/2010, at 12:36 PM, Geoff Huston wrote: > >>>> - Key roll-over algorithm >>>> >>>> Our software currently implements a specific way to do roll-overs. At >>>> the time we implemented this it wasn't 100% clear to us how this >>>> *should* be done, and indeed whether there should be some prescribed way >>>> to do this. >>> >>> I believe that we need to have a single, prescribed way to do this; each CA >>> needs to know what is expected of it by its subordinate CAs and by all RPs. >>> I believe we should have a separate document that clearly articulates what >>> a CA is required to do. There are CA-local aspects to this procedure, as >>> Geoff's text notes. The parameters for those belong in the CPS for the CA. >>> The current description is not normative and I think that needs to change. >>> >> >> >> You are proposing that the procedure as described in section 8 of >> draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs-18.txt be placed into a normative form in its own >> document? > > > In collaboration with George Michaelson and Steve Kent, we have lifted out > section 8 of draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs-18.txt and placed into a normative > form in its own document. This is in the drafts repository as > draft-huston-sidr-keyroll-00.txt. > > I would like to request via the WG chairs that the WG adopt this document as > a WG document.
I am not sure what the procedure is, but I'd like to +1 this for adoption. Cheers Tim _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
