Thanks for all the info, Andrew.
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Andrew Chi wrote:
On 11/10/2010 11:55 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Can you say a bit more about how you generated this test data?
Sure. This purpose of this testbed is to make sure BBN's validator is (1)
correct and (2) fast enough to handle ~300,000 objects. Our testbed
generation software automatically constructs one or more statistically
realistic repositories, based on current counts for RPKI certificates, CRLs,
ROAs, and manifests.
What's your idea of when the software would be validating all 300K entries
at once, and would need to do so quickly?
We are *not* running up/down software. However, creating parent-child
relationships in a top-down manner necessarily requires us to carry out
similar request/suballocation actions in memory.
The input to our testbed is a specification file that defines (1) the
resources of the trust anchor, (2) a number of CA types and the *amount* of
resources assigned to each type, and (3) the parent-child relationships +
branching factors.
CA "types"??
--Sandy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
