This change works for me, I support the request for the WGLC for this
document.
Andrei
Karen Seo wrote on 16/11/10 4:31 PM:
> Sandy, Chris -- If there are no complaints by the end of this week about
> the proposed change below, we will have addressed all known comments and
> request that you declare WGLC done on the Certificate Policy.
>
> All -- Based on input from Geoff Huston and Randy Bush, we propose to
> change the 2nd paragraph of the Overview as follows.
>
> From:
> "The structure of the RPKI is modeled on the existing organizational
> structure that is already responsible for IP address and AS number
> resource allocation. In this allocation hierarchy, IANA allocates
> resources to five Regional Internet Registries (RIRs), each of which
> manages address and AS number allocation within a defined
> geopolitical region. The RIRs in turn allocate resources to Internet
> Service Providers, to subscribers with so-called provider-
> independent ("portable") allocations, and in some regions, to
> National Internet Registries (NIRs). (The term LIR is used in some
> regions to refer to what other regions define as an ISP. Throughout
> the rest of this document we will use the term ISP to simplify
> references to these entities.)"
>
> To:
> "The structure of the RPKI is congruent with the number resource
> allocation framework of the Internet. The IANA allocates number
> resources for special purposes [RFC5736], to Regional Internet
> Registries (RIRs), and to others. The RIRs, in turn, manage the
> allocation of number resources to end users, Internet Service
> Providers, and others."
>
> Thank you,
> Karen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
