The text refers to "rcynic" in two places. However, rcynic is not the only
relying party software that supports the RTR protocol. Wouldn't it
improve the generality of the text to say "relying party software that
supports this protocol (such as rcynic)" instead of just "rcynic".
On 18/11/2010, at 2:55 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Randy Bush has requested a WG LC for draft "The RPKI/Router Protocol".
The document and the draft version history are available at
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr.
The Last Call will end Wed, 1 Dec 2010 (AOE).
As usual, please address all comments to the WG mailing list, and
please be clear in your comments to this last call if you are
supporting the document's submission to the IESG or if you are
opposed. If you are opposed, please indicate why.
--Sandy, speaking with wg chair cloche on
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
--
Byron Ellacott email: [email protected]
Technical Director, APNIC sip: [email protected]
http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858 3100
________________________________________________________________________
* Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
