this works for me

  Geoff

On 01/12/2010, at 11:16 PM, Sean Turner wrote:

> Sandy,
> 
> My only reservation with this document before I support progressing it is the 
> following from section 4.2:
> 
> When a key rollover occurs, the EE certificate for the RPKI signed
> object MUST be re-issued, under the key of the NEW CA.  A CA MAY
> choose to treat this EE certificate the same way that it deals with
> CA certificates, i.e., to copy over all fields and extensions, and
> MAY change only the notBefore date and the serial number.  If the CA
> adopts this approach, then the new EE certificate is inserted into
> the CMS wrapper, but the signed context remains the same.  (If the
> signing time or binary signing time values in the CMS wrapper are
> non-null, they MAY be updated to reflect the current time.)
> 
> I think a note/warning/pointer is needed to reiterate what's in Section 
> 2.1.6.4.3/4 of [ID.ietf-sidr-signed-object] because normally changing the 
> value of signed attribute would invalidate the signature on that object.  
> [ID.ietf-sidr-signed-object] says:
> 
> The presence or absence of the SigningTime/BinarySigningTime attribute MUST 
> NOT affect the validity of the signed object.
> 
> So maybe adding something like:
> 
> As noted in Section 2.1.6.4.3 and 2.1.6.4.4 of [ID.ietf-sidr-signed-object], 
> the presence or absence of the SigningTime and/or the BinarySigningTime 
> attribute MUST NOT affect the validity of the signed object.
> 
> would help us CMS weenies ;)
> 
> spt
> 
> On 11/17/10 11:56 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>> 
>> Geoff Huston has requested a WG LC for draft "CA Key Rollover in the RPKI".
>> 
>> The document and the draft version history are available at
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/draft-ietf-sidr-keyroll.
>> 
>> The Last Call will end Wed, 1 Dec 2010 (AOE).
>> 
>> As usual, please address all comments to the WG mailing list, and
>> please be clear in your comments to this last call if you are
>> supporting the document's submission to the IESG or if you are
>> opposed. If you are opposed, please indicate why.
>> 
>> --Sandy, speaking with wg chair derby on
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

--

Geoff Huston
Chief Scientist, APNIC

+61 7 3858 3100
[email protected]




_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to