On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Christopher Morrow
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Christopher Morrow
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Karen Seo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:02:42 -0500
>>>> To: Andrei Robachevsky <[email protected]>, Sandra Murphy
>>>> <[email protected]>, Chris Morrow <[email protected]>
>>>> From: Karen Seo <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [sidr] Certificate Policy -- last change
>>>> Cc: kseo
>>>> Bcc:
>>>> X-Attachments:
>>>>
>>>> Andrei -- Yes, I was planning to submit another draft that incorporated
>>>> this and any other changes that were requested during the WGLC.
>>
>> ah, cool.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Sandy, Chris -- Is the WGLC completed for this draft?
>>
>> I don't believe I've seen one for the sidr-cp doc... we should do
oy, not my day for email :) but, there IS one WGLC for this doc, 2.5
months or so.
-chris
<wg-co-chair-busted-heli-hat == on>
>> that, if all of the above is completed, spin a new draft ver then we
>> can WGLC it?
>
> oops, forgot:
> -Chris
> <wg-co-chair-ski-hat == on>
>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Karen
>>>>
>>>>> I believe these changes have not been incorporated in the I-D yet. Could
>>>>> this be done and a WGLC requested please?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei Robachevsky wrote on 18/11/10 3:05 PM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This change works for me, I support the request for the WGLC for this
>>>>>> document.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Karen Seo wrote on 16/11/10 4:31 PM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sandy, Chris -- If there are no complaints by the end of this week
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> the proposed change below, we will have addressed all known comments
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> request that you declare WGLC done on the Certificate Policy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All -- Based on input from Geoff Huston and Randy Bush, we propose to
>>>>>>> change the 2nd paragraph of the Overview as follows.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From:
>>>>>>> "The structure of the RPKI is modeled on the existing organizational
>>>>>>> structure that is already responsible for IP address and AS number
>>>>>>> resource allocation. In this allocation hierarchy, IANA allocates
>>>>>>> resources to five Regional Internet Registries (RIRs), each of which
>>>>>>> manages address and AS number allocation within a defined
>>>>>>> geopolitical region. The RIRs in turn allocate resources to Internet
>>>>>>> Service Providers, to subscribers with so-called provider-
>>>>>>> independent ("portable") allocations, and in some regions, to
>>>>>>> National Internet Registries (NIRs). (The term LIR is used in some
>>>>>>> regions to refer to what other regions define as an ISP. Throughout
>>>>>>> the rest of this document we will use the term ISP to simplify
>>>>>>> references to these entities.)"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>> "The structure of the RPKI is congruent with the number resource
>>>>>>> allocation framework of the Internet. The IANA allocates number
>>>>>>> resources for special purposes [RFC5736], to Regional Internet
>>>>>>> Registries (RIRs), and to others. The RIRs, in turn, manage the
>>>>>>> allocation of number resources to end users, Internet Service
>>>>>>> Providers, and others."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Karen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> sidr mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sidr mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
