There was a short intense discussion of the intended RFC status of this draft and the draft draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate: Informational or Standards. As wg chair, I saw several opinions expressed (one of them mine as wg member), none agreeing.
A query went to a handful of potential customers of this work (implementers and operators), asking that if this issue mattered to them they express their opinion on the list. No opinion was expressed. The on-list opinions varied too much to call wg consensus for change in this matter. Therefore no change in status is necessary in this draft or in draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate. The WGLC period concluded long ago. I am satisfied that the working group consensus is that the draft is worthy of publication. I have started the process of advancing the draft for publication. Sorry for the delayed notice to the group. --Sandy, speaking with wg co-chair snood on > -----Original Message----- > From: Murphy, Sandra > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:02 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: WG LC for draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10 > > > Geoff Huston has requested a WG LC for draft "Validation of Route > Origination using the Resource Certificate PKI and ROAs". > > The document and the draft version history are available at > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation. > > The Last Call will end Wed, 1 Dec 2010 (AOE). > > As usual, please address all comments to the WG mailing list, and > please be clear in your comments to this last call if you are > supporting the document's submission to the IESG or if you are > opposed. If you are opposed, please indicate why. > > --Sandy, speaking with wg chair turban on _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
