On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

> i propose that i rev the doc to say
>  o the transport must provide authentication and integrity
>  o the current ssh description is an example
>  o other transport meeting the authentication and integrity constraints
>    are welcome

This sounds acceptable to me.

- Jared

> of course, this will leave open the mandatory-to-implement LCD issue.
> sigh.

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to