At 8:53 PM +0100 7/15/11, Stewart Bryant wrote:
SIDR WG,
During IESG review the there was a preference for
draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to be Standards Track
rather than BCP.
Making this change does not require a new IETF LC.
I want to get sense of whether the WG would be OK
with this change of track.
If anyone has a reason not to change to Standards
Track, please let me know by 29th July.
Thanks
Stewart
I'm comfortable with standard (instead of BCP).
Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
