I support both too. spt
On 8/4/11 7:38 PM, Roque Gagliano wrote:
I support adoption of both documents with one comment: On "draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib", I would not use the word "ROATable". The router does not interact with ROAs and I believe it is confusing. In "draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-02", the same table is referred as: "pfx_validate_table". Roquei would request the wg adopt draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib yes, they are works in progress. but that's what a wg is for. fwiw, bert is hacking away. expect fuller work in a week. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
