I agree that some additional indexes in the tables may be needed, to avoid the situation described by Arturo.
regards, Carlos On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Arturo Servin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Support. > > Some comments. > > Roque previously mentioned something similar, for me it's a bit > confusing to talk about ROAs validity in a router. In my mind ROAs are > validated somewhere else and in routers you search for the validity of a > prefix which I think what is referenced here. > > Also, as Robert Raszuk mentioned I am a bit concerned that in order to > get the validity of a prefix first I need to get a table with ~400k entries. > I do not normally get a full table BGP via SNMP so may be my concern is > unjustified by my lack of experience. May be is it just the way it is with > SNMP and we need to live with it. > > Cheers, > -as > > > On 5 Aug 2011, at 11:39, Matthias Waehlisch wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Randy Bush wrote: >> >>> i would request the wg adopt >>> >>> draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib >>> draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib >>> >> >> I support the adoption, as well. >> >> >> Cheers >> matthias >> >> -- >> Matthias Waehlisch >> . Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST >> . Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany >> .. mailto:[email protected] .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl >> :. Also: http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > -- -- ========================= Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo http://www.labs.lacnic.net ========================= _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
