> Let me clarify one nit ... > > In the other mail you said: > > "any announcement of any prefixes in that space, from /16 to /32, from > an AS other than 42 are INVALID." > > In the light of the below quote from origin-ops-10 should the above be > reworded as: > > "any announcement of any prefixes in that space, from /16 to /32, from > an AS other than 42 are INVALID unless a valid ROA is present in the > RPKI covering such sub-allocation"
perhaps you missed the start of the discussion >> if i publish a roa for 10.0.0.0/16-16 for AS 42 (and there are no >> other roas for 10/...) randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
