On 11/1/11 9:25 AM, t.petch wrote:
Bert That makes me wonder what you would regard as the base MIB for bgp4. The idr WG has been updating it for over five years, and the topic surfaces occasionally on that list but I cannot recall anything for a year now, so what would the base be? (And yes, I like one I-D, one MIB module instead of two). Tom Petch
Hi Tom. That is a question I asked myself too. I found various troubles in the MIB module that is out a an I-D. So I was weary about extending that one, fearing that it may take too long to get that MIB module approved. It is I think up to the WG to decide which one they want to extend. It would be good if the newer module could be used, but since it is not making progress I wonder what the status is and if the/any WG participants actually intend to implement it. I did send an email to Jeff Haas to ask him about the status of that module. Sofar no response yet. Jeff, have you seen my email? Bert _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
