On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:41 AM, George, Wes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: [email protected] > >> there were a slew of changes (or a slew of comments made) requested, a >> document update happened ~13 days ago, did the changes account for the >> comments/requests or not? >> > > [WEG] I diffed 11 and 12 when 12 came out, and no, not really. As I recall, > Shane already replied that the proposed text (that made it into -12) was not > adequate in explaining rationale around the recommendation of "close" for > RPKI cache placement, among other things. (cf. emails on 10/31). Don't know > if additional changes are pending for -13 based on those comments, but the > mail thread died on the 31st with no further responses. >
ok, I was/am looking for status. I think randy replied to shane's note (or another note form shane) a bit ago, and talks some about 'close'. I believe that a new version just arrived in the repository as well. -chris > Wes George > > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable > proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to > copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for > the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not > the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the > contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender > immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail > and any printout. > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
