Sure. Put another way, validity of an PATH_SIG can expire, whether we intended it to, or not.
dougm -- Doug Montgomery Mgr. Internet & Scalable Systems Research / ITL / NIST On 3/12/12 5:12 PM, "Stephen Kent" <[email protected]> wrote: >At 9:45 AM -0500 3/9/12, Montgomery, Douglas wrote: >>Just so we understand that they are distinct issues. How to key, re-key >>routers and reflect that in the RPKI is necessary even if we don't take >>on >>the "stale update problem". >> >>If rekeying is our approach to control the validity period of stale >>updates, then the issues become inter-related. If we use other methods >>to >>control validity periods, they are not. >> >>dougm >>-- >>Doug Montgomery - Mgr. Internet & Scalable Systems Research / ITL / NIST > >Doug, > >A minor quibble. > >Whether we view router cert validity intervals as the primary way to >manage >signed advertisement lifetimes, or not, the two are related, at least >in principle. > >Steve _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
