quick response to a single point... below.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Brian Dickson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Christopher Morrow
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > And, if we acknowledge that it is a new feature, it then is incumbent
>> > on the WG members and chairs, to listen to all the WG participants,
>> > regarding what the requirements are in reaching the charter's goals,
>> > whether they are explicitly in the charter, or implicit consequences
>> > of what is necessary and sufficient in reaching those goals. This
>> > would potentially include other attributes being added, other data
>> > being cryptographically protected, and/or other negotiated peering
>> > parameters.
>>
>> Sure, sort of like deprecating as-set usage... which happened in IDR,
>> but was a consequence of discussion in SIDR that said: "Hey, we have
>> no idea how to secure this, it's non-deterministic data and the
>> aggregator doesn't have required material in order to 'secure' the
>> as-set which is in the as-path. Beyond that the usage of AS-SET in the
>> wild is by and large broken/not-helpful, so deprecating this will not
>> harm existing users of the system."
>>
>> Which I think is basically what's happening with this discussion, no?
>> perhaps we/wgfolk did a "Exercise is left to the reader, but for now
>> go talk to IDR"?
>>
>
> I'm cool with that...

This part, I think, gets to the meat of the process part which really
is that if the bit being done is not directly 'security' (which to
some extent SIDR should have the say-so on) it ought to be done in
IDR. It seems that having the sidr side folks discuss this and agree
on direction is the right thing to do (which mostly happened
here/on-list so far).

Perhaps with at least some discussion in paris/sidr we'll circle to
the answer completely.

thanks!
-chris
(again, just a regular sidr person, which I forgot to say last time :( )
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to