On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Russ White <[email protected]> wrote: >> nope, it's bits that you can choose to use or not. > > In other words, you've added another set of "wiggle words" to your > definition. "It's not policy because it's not signing something saying > you shouldn't do x, and because anyone can ignore the signature anyway."
no, I don't think we can enforce any one use this... no matter how shiney it may seem. I think if we offer more data to the bgp-user, in a fashion they can digest and use, they may make a better decision. we can not, today, publish or require publishing 'you can only advertise to X'. Certainly a single operator can decide 'I will only advertise to X' or 'I will only accept Y advertisements from Z' (this happens today, outside of any concept of 'security' and the protocol). -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
