On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > By chaos I meant complete autonomous selection of what paths are preferred > to be chosen as best on an AS by AS basis. In the case of mixed SIGNED and
how is the above any different that what happens today? (inside a single ASN, each router decides what it thinks is 'best', hopefully with a coordinated policy across all devices, but ... that is not guaranteed!) > UNSIGNED paths being consider in this _local_ decision as you stated it > seems to me just like it is the case with bad uncorrelated policies more > harm can be accomplished then good. sure... should someone say: "ACHTUNG!! OPENZ PEEPERZ!! USE THE SAME POLICY ON ALL DEVICES!!" ? I think, I thought, I hope that the above message is (perhaps less comically) stated to all network engineers when they graduate and get their striped hats... (so thus NOT a required statement in an RFC-like document) -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
