On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:30:03AM -0700, Terry Manderson wrote: > I think this is interesting. I think I would further like an > assessment/disussion of this "serial number" being consistent between the > BGP information, the RPKI repository, and this through the validated cache > and presented to the router via rpki-rtr.
Would it be sufficient to put have the latest manifestNumber (from RFC 6486) be distributed as a single "route" signed using the normal BGPSEC procedures? With my usual apologies, I'm less clear on whether it's likely there will be more than one manifest on a per AS basis. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
