including sidr 

--
Jakob Heitz.


On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:57 PM, "Jakob Heitz" <[email protected]> wrote:

> This can be done.
> Like I said before: aggregate the signatures of the paths being aggregated.
> String all the signed paths together (after wrapping them with a header), add 
> your SKI and destination AS (as normal) and sign over the lot.
> 
> Question is: does anyone want to?
> 
> --
> Jakob Heitz.
> 
> 
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:17 PM, "Tony Li" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 28, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>> 
>>>>> * Continue to call as_aggregate and still generate AS_SET
>>>>> effectively depreciating RFC6472 (quagga approach)
>>>> 
>>>> Generating sets is the safest thing to do.
>>> 
>>> Glad you said this. I do agree.
>> 
>> 
>> Understood, but how do you ever secure this?  Set SIDR aside for a second, 
>> what would ANY path verification mechanism have to do to secure the full 
>> path?
>> 
>> It would seem that the ONLY thing one could reasonably do is to describe the 
>> full topology, and that would seem to require the ability to describe an 
>> arbitrary tree, not just a set of vectors of paths.
>> 
>> Tony
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idr mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to