On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Danny McPherson <[email protected]> wrote: > > i don't think the rsync scale issues surprise anyone that was paying > attention. If we're already considering new architectures, substrates, et > al., here perhaps we shouldn't be so quick on the trigger for Standards Track > work and move this and related "investigation" to the IRTF, or at least > ensure they're only Experimental until broader experience is gained. >
terry seemed interested (and had a draft from 08 that looked like an alternate option for transport) in gathering some requirements and options for transport... I think in the end having more than one transport is good, having one to start things off though is also good. -chris > Looking at the charts you presented I can only imagine what will happen with > 40K RPs and >1M objects (which might be a reasonable assumption if this were > fully deployed today - and that's only focusing on routed number resources). > > -danny > > > On Mar 26, 2012, at 1:33 PM, Rob Austein wrote: > >> For those who didn't get to see the end of the "RPKI Over BitTorrent" >> presentation in today's SIDR meeting, the full slide deck is available >> at >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-sidr-9.pdf >> >> and should be relatively self-explanatory. >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
