At Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:57:19 -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Draft Author Ship Steerers, > This we didn't chat about at the meeting(s), but are there outstanding > bits/pieces or should this be sent along for WGLC in the near future?
Not ready yet. A few year's experience of using this protocol suggests the need for an additional message type, to let the RPKI engine monitor what the publication server has on file for it. We've seen a few cases where, for whatever reason (bug, system crash, ...) the two can get out of sync, and while it's theoretically possible for the RPKI engine to determine what's in the publication repository by fetching as if it were a relying party, it'd probably be easier just to let the RPKI engine ask the publication server directly. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
