On Apr 11, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> 
> 
>> From there, we can discuss the issue of, for example, HOW TO onboard and 
>> purge signing and validating certificates to routers from the RPKI -- [I 
>> suspect the intention was to use rpki-rtr protocol for this, but it doesn't 
>> currently support it, nor are the security implications clear].
>> 
> 
> The rtr cert/ee-cert part was never planned/designed to be done via rpki-rtr.
> Ideally at provisioning time your ee-cert is dropped onto the box,
> similar to base-config today. Potentially your fav vendor has a
> methodology in their plan for this. I can't imagine it's too tough,
> nor that it's exact specification needs to be in an IETF doc (since it
> seems implementation specific). Could be wrong though.

It has huge implications on the scale and operations, particularly when 
considering how rollovers and other such changes are effectuated.  Also, 
decoupling these entirely from validating certificates means I've got two 
mechanisms now for on-boarding [just] these things.  I'd prefer not to leave 
this to "magic happens" given that it's foundational to pretty much everything 
else that's being built.

> sure, some modelling seems like a good thing here, I think this was
> asked for at the mic in PAR as well, no? (in response to some
> discussions with Sriram?)

Yep!

> we can chat about that on-list or in the meeting... I suppose there's
> a slew of milestones which are 'complete', there aren't really any
> changes (that I planned) from an 'adding things' perspective. The
> ops-documentation (see wiki) to me is probably NOT an ietf document,
> again happy to talk at the meeting about that though.


I'd be interested in lining out the longer-term deliverables for the group on 
the list..

-danny

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to