Chris,
For the agenda item: "Deployment Discussion -> Discuss the need, and
publication location/method, for documentation that details rollout of SIDR
technologies in an operational network." Are we going to discuss what Tim
suggested in his e-mail on March 30th (subject: rpki repository and validation
issues). I think he pointed out three valid points to discuss (at least start
with the first 2 as he suggested):
"(1) enumerate the problems that we see, and (2) refine a list of
requirements for improvement, and then (3) find ways forward to address these
requirements, without breaking the existing infrastructure".
Is that the intention of the agenda item? Or are you planning to
discuss something else?
Cheers,
.as
On 11 Apr 2012, at 19:22, Chris Morrow wrote:
> Howdy folks,
> For those interested in the Apr 30 Interim meeting, we updated the wiki:
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/trac/wiki/InterimMeeting20120430>
>
> to include as much as we currently can say about the
> location/agenda/remote-participation-foo. I believe that the intent is
> to run the meeting as a completely virtual meeting, with some folks
> localized in space/time as space permits.
>
> We attempted to expound on the questions Arturo and Danny had in the
> draft-agenda announcement with the wiki content. If there are further
> questions please ask.
>
> -chris
> <co-chair>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
