On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: >> 1) late start/technology fail with the webex (probably webex >> operations failures more than anything - my fault) > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_check > >> 6) microphone discipline for in-room vs external folks, often the >> in-room folk displayed (me too) an inability to wait their turn >> (jump into the conversation directly without queuing up, etc) > > like it or not, when there are 20 people in the room, the need for queue > discipline is not obvious. so it becomes more critical that remote folk > can break in equally. > > i would like to hear from folk who participated remotely. ruediger > seemed to be able to participate as if he was in the room. which of the > 19 semi-functional technologies was he using? (and he is unlikely to > get/answer email) > > in $dayjob, this kind of meeting has video of the participants, which, > imiho, aids equality.
agreed, videoconference works quite well for office things (sometimes 2-3 large rooms + 20 or so remote folks at desks) anyways, yes more from remote people. thanks! -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
