Hey Chris, Yeah, I read that. I know there's a tendency for some people to want to talk about bath houses on this list, but I was going to pass on that.
As for draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying-00.txt, that draft just points out the inadequacies of either approach and that there is no good solution. My take is that this is indicative of a misalignment between a given architecture and implicit requirements. Sometimes you can't patch the holes in a leaky ship, you need to reassess the requirements. I think the evidence illustrates that this is the case here. Eric ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Morrow [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 09:28 PM To: Osterweil, Eric Cc: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [sidr] RPKI and private keys (was RE: Interim Meeting Draft Agenda: 04-30-2012 (April 30, 2012))) On 05/04/2012 08:59 PM, Osterweil, Eric wrote: > His point is NOT addressed by any draft in the wg (since you asked). read randy's mentioned draft? _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
