The call for adoption having completed successfully, the authors may submit a wg draft draft-ietf-sidr-xxx-00 at their convenience.
--Sandy. speaking as wg co-chair ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Christopher Morrow [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:25 PM To: Chris Morrow Cc: [email protected]; sidr wg Subject: Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying-00.txt oh, for reasons I can't explain we already did this, yay! (mar 26 or so) even better I think we said it concluded successfully... and it someone (me) should fix the document location/train in the tools interface. so, hopefully people didn't read too much of this version already :) -chris On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Chris Morrow <[email protected]> wrote: > Howdy WG folk, > The authors of: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying-00> > > Would like to see if the document meets WG usefulness levels high enough > to be included as a WG document. The abstract of the doc is (for the > click-lazy): > > BGPsec-speaking routers must be provisioned with private keys and the > corresponding public key must be published in the global Resource > PKI. This document describes two ways of doing so, router-driven and > operator-driven. > > This seems to fit into at least one of the current list-discussions, so > topicality seems on-point. > > Please discuss this, review the doc and let's conclude this decision > process 28 May 2012 (5/28/2012 or 28/5/2012). > > -chris > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
