>>>>> Can you expound more what you mean by "aliasing" above? Do you >>>>> mean local-as, etc. >>>> yep >>> That's strange. Why doesn't the following comment to the list back >>> in March of this year count as "no comments on list to ... >>> aliasing"? >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04093.html >> it counted so much we spent a good bit of time on it in the april >> meeting. we, possibly foolishly, thought we had local convergence. > For those of us who did not attend the April interim meeting, can you > point to where the list was asked if they agreed with the "local > convergence"?
i thought i just did that :) but, to be fair, i find the minutes lacking, to be kind. and this is really the chairs' job. and i am nose deep in tex with a journal paper drealine tomorrow. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
