Hi, On 18 Jun 2012, at 04:30, Randy Bush wrote: > it sounds as if tim wants to discuss a point in pfx-validate, and > whether it is a security issue. we need to get that draft gone, so > let's try to clear any issues folk have.
I am not sure if a lengthy discussion is needed. My point is just that I believe that pfx-validate should state its requirement for full knowledge clearly. How to meet this requirement is another matter and it does not have to block this draft as far as I am concerned. I would like to discuss stuff we are working on wrt another way to deal with the rpki repository, including ideas that might help to meet this requirement, at the pre-ietf interim. Tim _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
