Sandy, Just upload the old version as draft-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-00.
Link: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-00.txt Roque. On Jul 29, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Murphy, Sandra wrote: > The eventual response from the wg showed consensus for adoption of this draft. > > The authors may submit the draft as an initial version sidr draft > (draft-ietf-sidr-xxx-00). At your option, you may alert the chairs of the > draft name, and the submission can then be pre-approved. > > --Sandy > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Murphy, > Sandra [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 4:45 PM > To: Roque Gagliano (rogaglia); [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sidr] WG Adoption call for > draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt > > There were only two responses to this call for adoption. Both were positive > (and one was followed by extensive comments), but that's a pretty low > indication of wg interest. > > On the chance that people might be on holiday, we will give the wg until 5 > July (one week from today) to consider this work. > > This is your last chance, so speak up. > > --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Murphy, > Sandra [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 5:27 PM > To: Roque Gagliano (rogaglia); [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [sidr] WG Adoption call for > draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt > > The authors request below that the wg adopt this work as a work item. > > The draft is available at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover. > > Please respond to the list to say whether you accept this draft as a working > group draft and are willing to work on it. Remember that you do not need to > accept all content in a draft to adopt, as draft editors are required to > reflect the consensus of the working group. > > This call will end 26 Jun 2012. > > --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair > > > > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Roque > Gagliano (rogaglia) [[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 8:05 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [sidr] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt > > > > > > Dear WG, > > > > We submitted a new version of this draft based on the feedback from our last > meeting in Paris. > > > > As mentioned during Brian's presentation we would like to ask for WG adoption. > > > > Regards, > Roque > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: <[email protected]> > > > > Date: June 5, 2012 1:58:52 PM GMT+02:00 > > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt has been > successfully submitted by Roque Gagliano and posted to the IETF repository. > > > > Filename: draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover > > Revision: 01 > > Title: BGPSEC router key rollover as an alternative to beaconing > > Creation date: 2012-06-05 > > WG ID: Individual Submission > > Number of pages: 15 > > > > Abstract: > > The current BGPSEC draft documents do not specifies a key rollover > > process for routers. This document describes a possible key rollover > > process and explores its impact to mitigate replay attacks and > > eliminate the need for beaconing in BGPSEC. > > > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
